Pages: [1] 2 |
1. What do you think is wrong with EVE? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eve is old! Still a good game ...but old. An Eve 2.0 with new game mechanics wouldn't be a bad thing.
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2017.02.11 13:12:41
|
2. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cloacky camping null sec systems mostly affects player "ISK making" activities. A certain number of players affected by this often decide to buy PLEXs to convert into ISKies. This is $$$ for CCP so I do not expect CCP to touch this. My two cents.
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2016.06.27 15:06:37
|
3. Forumbreaking inbalance! What is CCP going to do about this?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some people have multiple accounts and will use these to give themselves some likes in order to "boost" the credibility of their replies. Other people are just popular and have a lot of *ss kissing fans. Some posters understand the "culture" of mo...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.08.15 11:41:00
|
4. WH connections to regular space systems with no jump gates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Random Majere wrote: Imagine a few stable WHs, scatered throughout New Eden`s empire space, leading into a new and unexplored galaxy! That would be interesting !!
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.08.13 16:16:00
|
5. Wargames? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Sentamon wrote: baltec1 wrote: We finally reset test and people complain about it. It's so precious how you try and pretend you're not one huge carebear zerg. So cute and cuddly. We are literally cyno camping eachot...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.03.05 15:59:00
|
6. Wargames? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lisa Ann Miller wrote: What's your problem with RvB? Did we do anything to you? Did we call you mate? You're mad bro? Seriously... I have nothing against RvB. RvB serves its purpose...in high sec..for players who wish to learn PvP.
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.03.05 14:34:00
|
7. Wargames? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KuroVolt wrote: Hes talking about how HBC, CFC and possibly N3 are going to stop fighting eachother once they have divided the map amongst eachother and will then use one neutral region where they will have gladiator like battles with one anoth...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.03.05 14:32:00
|
8. Wargames? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So what is going on in Delve`s NOL system these days? Null sec RvB style fights? Is that was is happening?
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.03.05 13:59:00
|
9. Wargames? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What are these wargames that we are starting to hear about? Is it a game within a game? As CCP`s beloved universe become a joke?
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.03.05 13:43:00
|
10. low sec-the joke - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: A few points: 1: I agree with the idea that Low Sec should have unique rewards available there. I also agree with you on that...the question is, what should these rewards be?
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.03.04 17:08:00
|
11. TiDi is at 60% in Sinq Laison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP should consider giving their hamster EPO. And rename him "Lance". But on a more serious side, could it be that their is to much people in high sec atm.
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.27 16:56:00
|
12. No Local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Theresa Lamont wrote: And don`t forget...sometimes they have cynos! This is less of a threat without local than it is with local, which may seem strange. With local, cynos get used tactically, to avoid warning a target ...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.14 17:29:00
|
13. No Local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Goldensaver wrote: I think it might even be interesting if while a cloaky was in system, regardless of the range you set D-scan at, if it was within 15AU of you you'd get an "anomalous reading" on the D-scan. Basically it'd tell you there's a ...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.14 17:08:00
|
14. No Local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Nikk Narrel wrote: Theresa Lamont wrote: Nikk Narrel wrote: Please, explain how being unable to see who is in a system, and needing to search for them, makes hunting easier? Also consider the uncertainty that ...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.14 16:40:00
|
15. No Local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Goldensaver wrote: Theresa Lamont wrote: Nikk Narrel wrote: Please, explain how being unable to see who is in a system, and needing to search for them, makes hunting easier? Also consider the uncertainty that anyone is in the system to b...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.14 16:39:00
|
16. No Local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Please, explain how being unable to see who is in a system, and needing to search for them, makes hunting easier? Also consider the uncertainty that anyone is in the system to be found at all, which is an element missing fro...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.14 16:01:00
|
17. No Local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I personnaly do not mind if local gets removed. But in doing so, CCP needs to make a few other changes (specially on dscan) to keep a fair and logical balance between hunter and prey. Having to constantly spam a dscan button in a sci-fi game is nu...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.14 15:13:00
|
18. Idea expand thy universe - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Commander Ted wrote: Null sec is big enough. The problem is its so easy for big alliances to travel across it and gobble up space. Then it is not big enough!! What if, New Eden would have a very few stable WHs to another Galaxy. Thousands ...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.13 18:57:00
|
19. Moons - just when will ccp do anything - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What if moon mining would go from "passive" to "active"?
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.02.07 15:21:00
|
20. Things CCP doesn't talk about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Eterne wrote: We have discussions about these issues (and more) internally all the time. Our discussions internally have not yet led to information that is in a state finalized enough to share with the public. Yeah...I`m sure the Devs of...
- by Theresa Lamont - at 2013.01.11 16:25:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |